| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> there's a few packages still known to |
| 3 |
> build fail, but they've had quite some time to sort their stuff out, so i don't |
| 4 |
> see delaying further making a difference there. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
So you're saying you're fine to break: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
- everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need |
| 9 |
1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50); |
| 10 |
- everything depending on gnutls (current 2.x version does not build |
| 11 |
with glibc 2.16, and quite a few things don't build with gnutls 3); |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Congrats, this is just the kind of behaviour that makes Gentoo look |
| 14 |
professional... no wait I meant the other way around I guess. Because |
| 15 |
the automake 1.12 breakage is not enough to have in tree, hm? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 19 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives