| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:37:11 -0400 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> You're basically asking for the practice of hard-masks for testing to |
| 5 |
> be banned. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
My original point in the other thread was that "masked for testing" is |
| 8 |
not a valid reason. A reference to an outstanding issue, bug report, |
| 9 |
discussion or other resources would help users determine whether it's |
| 10 |
safe for them to unmask an ebuild locally. "Masked for testing" offers |
| 11 |
no guidance at all and is nothing more than a lazy substitute for real |
| 12 |
content. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
jer |
Archives