| 1 |
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 17:50, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 17:08, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'm just curious, is there a reason why the gentoo module is not |
| 4 |
> > monitored by CIA-2 and shown in #gentoo-commits? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I checked and we still sending the .xml mails for gentoo-x86 and |
| 8 |
> gentoo-src modules to the CIA upon commits as can be seen here |
| 9 |
> http://cia.navi.cx/stats/author/wolf31o2 |
| 10 |
> So everything still seems correct on our end. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You might want to ask scanline on freenode on why the bot is not playing |
| 13 |
> along. Make sure it's not +q on that chan either. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Correction. Sorry I failed to notice you were explicitly asking about |
| 16 |
the 'gentoo' module. (solar is doing to many things at once and trying |
| 17 |
to help alot of people) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks luke-jr for pointing this out to me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
To answer your question correctly this time. |
| 22 |
The reason is twofold |
| 23 |
1) simply nobody has ever requested it before. |
| 24 |
2) I have a few minor security concerns about gentoo/admin |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If requested I don't see any problem with enabling it on some of the |
| 27 |
other subdirs within the 'gentoo' module. |
| 28 |
Just file me a bug with what you want enabled. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives