1 |
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2007 schrieb Petteri Räty: |
2 |
> Danny van Dyk kirjoitti: |
3 |
> > Hi all, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > [CC'ing council@g.o as requested by GLEP amendment from March 8th, |
6 |
> > 2007] |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > A subset of council members decided today that multiple version |
9 |
> > suffixes are illegal in the tree pending further notice. This |
10 |
> > decission can be appealed at the next Council meeting. If there is |
11 |
> > sufficient public demand, an earlier meeting can be held. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > This decission has been made to prevent sufficient precedence for |
14 |
> > unilateral changes to the tree structure. So far the following |
15 |
> > package versions are considered illegal: |
16 |
|
17 |
> What is the reason this needed an urgent decision? This was first |
18 |
> added to the tree little under three months ago so why not just wait |
19 |
> for the next council meeting? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> *alsa-driver-1.0.14_rc2_p3234 (04 Feb 2007) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> 04 Feb 2007; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> |
24 |
> +alsa-driver-1.0.14_rc2_p3234.ebuild: |
25 |
> Add a new snapshot required for kernel 2.6.20. |
26 |
|
27 |
From my POV: |
28 |
|
29 |
* alsa version commited to the tree, |
30 |
* mplayer version has been commited, |
31 |
* alsa version has been removed, |
32 |
* general discussion started on what combinations are allowed |
33 |
* somewhere in between the transcode version was added |
34 |
|
35 |
My rationale was and is to stop people continueing to add such versions |
36 |
w/o prior discussion. |
37 |
|
38 |
Danny |
39 |
-- |
40 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
41 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |