Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:20:02
Message-Id: 462E6582.4030408@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Danny van Dyk
1 Danny van Dyk kirjoitti:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > [CC'ing council@g.o as requested by GLEP amendment from March 8th, 2007]
5 >
6 > A subset of council members decided today that multiple version suffixes
7 > are illegal in the tree pending further notice. This decission can be
8 > appealed at the next Council meeting. If there is sufficient public
9 > demand, an earlier meeting can be held.
10 >
11 > This decission has been made to prevent sufficient precedence for
12 > unilateral changes to the tree structure. So far the following package
13 > versions are considered illegal:
14 >
15
16 What is the reason this needed an urgent decision? This was first added
17 to the tree little under three months ago so why not just wait for the
18 next council meeting?
19
20 *alsa-driver-1.0.14_rc2_p3234 (04 Feb 2007)
21
22 04 Feb 2007; Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o>
23 +alsa-driver-1.0.14_rc2_p3234.ebuild:
24 Add a new snapshot required for kernel 2.6.20.
25
26 Regards,
27 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>