| 1 |
SmallEiffel uses a negative versionnumbering-scheme... Don't ask me why... :P |
| 2 |
The first version was v1.0 and was released in 1995.. The last version is |
| 3 |
0.74, the version before that 0.75 etc.. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Now this is a bigger problem than the ones mentioned earlier... |
| 6 |
I REALLY hope they stop this crazyness with SmartEiffel.... :P |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
// Wigren |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Friday 22 November 2002 10:37 skrev Per Wigren: |
| 11 |
> Hi! |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'm about to make an ebuild of Sma{ll,rt}Eiffel and a new category |
| 14 |
> dev-eiffel with a lot of extra libs, modules, bindings etc.. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The problem is that SmallEiffel is about to be renamed to SmartEiffel.. The |
| 17 |
> current stable release is SmallEiffel v0.74, but it will be soon be renamed |
| 18 |
> to SmartEiffel when it becomes v1.0 (it's currently 1.0beta5).. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> How to resolve this? If I make an ebuild for SmallEiffel v0.74 now, I want |
| 21 |
> it to be upgraded to SmartEiffel v1.0 when it is released.. It's the very |
| 22 |
> same compiler, just renamed.. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Another problem is that the filenames doesn't contain the version-number... |
| 25 |
> All versions are named se.tgz so this will cause a problem when upgrading |
| 26 |
> if the old one is still in distfiles... |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Regards, |
| 29 |
> Per Wigren |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives