1 |
В Вск, 07/09/2008 в 02:05 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto пишет: |
2 |
> Our first attempt was to use a multislot use flag[1]. According to that |
3 |
> flag, we would set the SLOT and the PREFIX for the install. That has the |
4 |
> a very important problem - it breaks the invariancy of the SLOT and as |
5 |
> thus been put aside. |
6 |
|
7 |
Could you explain in a little bit more details why it's bad? How portage |
8 |
workarounds this now for binutils? |
9 |
|
10 |
In any case as FHS and /usr/kde/<version> installations should set |
11 |
differently SLOT seems that new portage feature is required... May be |
12 |
portage should allow setting SLOT in dependence on USE flag? Or new |
13 |
property for PROPERTIES called multislot which will workaround the |
14 |
problem with "invariancy of the SLOT"? |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Peter. |