| 1 |
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project |
| 4 |
>> leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there |
| 5 |
>> has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal |
| 6 |
>> project structure. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also with |
| 9 |
>> commitment. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list of |
| 12 |
>> undertakers competence. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> We already check for inactive members (developers and leaders are the |
| 16 |
> same for us) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> What's is this thread for? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in general, but |
| 23 |
inactive in a _project_. |
Archives