Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] about inactive project members/leaders
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:48:35
Message-Id: 525DA9C2.70605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] about inactive project members/leaders by hasufell
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
5 > On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
6 >> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
7 >>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
8 >>> leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case
9 >>> there has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the
10 >>> internal project structure.
11 >>
12 >>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also with
13 >>> commitment.
14 >>
15 >>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list of
16 >>> undertakers competence.
17 >>
18 >>
19 >> We already check for inactive members (developers and leaders are
20 >> the same for us)
21 >>
22 >> What's is this thread for?
23 >>
24 >>
25 >
26 > You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in general, but
27 > inactive in a _project_.
28 >
29
30 Err no. That's not our job. If the project has an inactive leader or
31 member it's the leaders job (or team's job if the leader is inactive)
32 to sort this out internally. If that fails, then they should seek
33 help. undertakers do not have (and neither want) the authority to
34 remove active developers from certain projects. If a project appears
35 to be dead even though it's members (and/or leader) are active in
36 other Gentoo areas, and they refuse to fix the situation, you may want to
37 take this to the Council. Seem like you need to re-read
38
39 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html
40
41 - --
42 Regards,
43 Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
44 http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
47
48 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSXanBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
49 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNTVDNDczOUYzRjJEMTRGNDRGMzU2RkMw
50 OUJGNEY1NEMyQkE3RjNDAAoJEAm/T1TCun886OIP/0cJDlFzV1lWryYscHXW+FqR
51 gQUlfcLDa1TQWJqvWZjPxE5RoeOpAfxf55nTYWX800vlIngnjALLTlOD4kqE/Hp6
52 uKZ6ydgSljvcR5aKJYGV4QVVn5NWis4eC8jGiGqdw47K6HxHGH6U9sPDzIxyH0YZ
53 2Nznq9LOTTHM0YONpHNiKJrv8xytKJcdOElTUpHUMBWru9xrpeYfdB3VsTBxQHaQ
54 l9lymVL1DsK5m8+iPXvk86K/D2swFo5uitt1DU5GY+ttWaJWG2e8tIx5pySXtsVv
55 j35pmCCmQ5VuBsYRLA5gMwhY2xdnHsQWwMe3jVtcxHpf3bqIkI1WE0Ahx55fz/1d
56 8RVEyyAkNFbZT2hF5w6r+X/+AeOD2FMKFGrTCQoaKQGg0wxvUGniKp2A4TTcHNcF
57 bdF16cFRVEFQSghmr3w3OJLLFnqjw8ojwPptoYbfyCcw0tDKcPAmy2KjRA/7pmO2
58 aH8FEEAZkI1brWGpAoWrCoE+O51hDbeYWWZgbMmzCM2dPMZnP0c0tyaVRzKlRHC5
59 3YERUyedl6UzwV2Q195JGFbJz5jmZwr6VXKj5cvlTjNFcZdOriphIIXgnEQlGG1z
60 8ib8eitlFLeIR0gaMB+BMEjm76+lDLOYfKqVhJQ1zJGimzR3gwEfSO9j4gYodOO8
61 GkAq1vbv65NJjGrN0j9l
62 =oLpu
63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] about inactive project members/leaders hasufell <hasufell@g.o>