| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive |
| 9 |
>>>> project leaders/members and remove them from the projects in |
| 10 |
>>>> case there has not been any activity for a while, regardless |
| 11 |
>>>> of the internal project structure. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also with |
| 14 |
>>>> commitment. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list of |
| 17 |
>>>> undertakers competence. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> We already check for inactive members (developers and leaders |
| 21 |
>>> are the same for us) |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> What's is this thread for? |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
>> You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in general, |
| 28 |
>> but inactive in a _project_. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Err no. That's not our job. If the project has an inactive leader |
| 32 |
> or member it's the leaders job (or team's job if the leader is |
| 33 |
> inactive) to sort this out internally. If that fails, then they |
| 34 |
> should seek help. undertakers do not have (and neither want) the |
| 35 |
> authority to remove active developers from certain projects. If a |
| 36 |
> project appears to be dead even though it's members (and/or leader) |
| 37 |
> are active in other Gentoo areas, and they refuse to fix the |
| 38 |
> situation, you may want to take this to the Council. Seem like you |
| 39 |
> need to re-read |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
I have read that and that is why I propose that undertakers do also |
| 46 |
check projects for their internal activity patterns. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
I don't really think that is a job for the council. |
| 49 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 50 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 51 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXatIAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzyeYH/0kg9I/SGmwXMTbjMcAQ5BOU |
| 54 |
xKAHhR2NrlqSdrZxGH55bS0L8wkxTj8WgTD8xV85s58Oa+koSMV8s4Fwg1myiyLK |
| 55 |
hxfip31BCLgTDEuWuQ8rMMYmPmpOgrN4s/Q0VlZSRxZOyLbJLHbgFoWkykYg04Ks |
| 56 |
PS85Ox3zdGPmFEMjkPjcqrAeYAPVY/ug/Dm81JOdn4kwlt+3zEK3zplAVznTm5nN |
| 57 |
qhdJJtDqOkBJcBC477EVqTQh6zyCEoOcwXF+vhUg3JGpN3ebQrYqLKIXlD1oYiTL |
| 58 |
VP93R/bh0QKYe6JjUhMhUQqWYVSIDD5ChQ4c6V2uJRT1JqwO2qdV0+lv98MEafM= |
| 59 |
=6gJs |
| 60 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives