| 1 |
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:12:32AM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 00:48 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 28 November 2005 00:05, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > 3) FEATURES="noman" is dropped in favour of USE="man" or USE="manpages" |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > In light of the above requirements and the fact that dyn_* will likely be |
| 7 |
> > > moved into the tree down the track, #3 seems to be the best in my mind. |
| 8 |
> > > Similarly, it would solve the previously discussed problems related to |
| 9 |
> > > FEATURES="test". |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
this seems like the best idea imo too ... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > I'd be very interested in people's thoughts on this. The more I think about |
| 14 |
> > it, the more I think it's the most appropriate solution. Nothing in |
| 15 |
> > FEATURES="noman nodoc noinfo test" affects portage whatsoever other than |
| 16 |
> > "noinfo" which (only recently) prevents emerge from regenerating info |
| 17 |
> > indexes. That one could be handled by a hook (although not yet available) and |
| 18 |
> > the rest could easily be switched to USE flags. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> USE=(man|info|doc) wont quite work. |
| 21 |
> While they could have an advantage that you can use them to control |
| 22 |
> depend strings the doc use flag has already been heavily used for other |
| 23 |
> things which everybody surely wont want. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
i dont see what USE=doc has to do with this ? doc should never be used |
| 26 |
to control manpages in ebuilds now ... |
| 27 |
-mike |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives