Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass, drop unused egg-base settings
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:14:03
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41ZcNUb9VbrhaLuOrsE8Oi_MV2vE1Z3Udv6Pz-f6eJMEg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass, drop unused egg-base settings by Brian Dolbec
1 On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > While working on the last 2 version bumps to the twisted package, I
4 > kept getting an error in which the *egg-info/SOURCES.txt file absolute
5 > paths for all the files found in that very same directory. They are
6 > required to be relative paths only. This problem currently only affects
7 > some pkgs depending on the setuptools pkg for install. The source of
8 > the change is that setuptools patches the cpython findall() with one
9 > that returns relative paths for anything in/below the passed in base
10 > directory. Everything else it returns the absolute path.
11 >
12 > Why we should apply this:
13 >
14 > Python upstream has merged the setuptools findall() code and will be
15 > included in the next releases of python, 2.7.13, 3.4.6, 3.5.4 (I
16 > think). So, there is potential for many more python pkgs to be
17 > affected by this that are not requiring setuptools for install.
18 > Without the ebb-base setting, the egg-info/* files are not included
19 > in SOURCES.txt. The install proceeds without error.
20 >
21 > NOTE: This first affects the python_compile_all phase, long before
22 > it even tries to run the tests (if enabled).
23 >
24 >
25 > Some history:
26 >
27 > The egg-base settings were originally added for parallel
28 > testing/install purposes. They are not used due to problems in
29 > parallelizing testing, etc.. (something along those lines, I
30 > don't want to search thru the logs, and mails to see what Michal's
31 > original words were about it.)
32 >
33 > I am working on twisted-16.5.0 and 16.6.0 releases (tests are still
34 > failing), but 16.6.0 has many improvements to the testing code, so has a
35 > lot fewer errors to fix. Once these are fixed and the eclass changes
36 > are merged, I will be able to add it to the tree.
37 >
38 > See attached patch. NOTE: actual commit message will be
39 > different/updated correctly. This was just an interim patch for
40 > testing and initial review.
41 >
42
43 Seems ok to me. Hopefully it doesn't break something in a subtle, hard
44 to detect way. ;-)

Replies