| 1 |
On Wed, 2 May 2007 16:49:32 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: |
| 5 |
> > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
| 6 |
> > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |
| 7 |
> > > Gentoo dev list to see. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I would like the council to remind everyone that this is not |
| 10 |
> > appropriate for any team |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> doesnt take much to get people in a hissy over nothing |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to |
| 15 |
breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in |
| 16 |
the tree, and then refusing to do anything about it is nothing? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> the issue has been taken care of |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
You have a conflict of interest in this one. What do other Council |
| 21 |
members who aren't games team members think? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> [to the detriment of users] |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
How is not having broken packages committed straight to stable |
| 26 |
detrimental to users? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives