Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

[Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov]

By the way, Diego, what is you current point of view on Gentoo default
init system?
i.e., what do you personally prefer to see as default init here: SystemD
or OpenRC?


[Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think
that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are
on "non-SysD-related udev" side.]

And, if anyone is interested in my opinion: I *HATE* when somebody (will
it be distro maintainers or RedHat corporation) forcing me their opinion
on _what_ should I use and _how_ should I use this. Thats why I hate
Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS, RHEL, SuSE and so on.
Thats why I'm using  Gentoo and Gentoo-derivatives (Sabayon, for
example) for almost 10 years.
Thats why I am an evangelist of Gentoo and it's derivatives.
More of that, thats why Daniel Robbins created Gentoo itself.
So, I really hope, that Gentoo will not obey RedHat's will and will not
force SystemD as default init system, and not drop pretty OpenRC to
trash. And I hope, that ryao's eudev will be most used (if not default)
variant of udev, since I'm sad with last vanilla udev functionality
"downgrades".



--
Best,
mva



18.11.2012 15:21, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет:
> On 18/11/2012 00:08, Greg KH wrote:
>> But if this fork is now the "official Gentoo fork", owned by the Gentoo
>> Foundation, and it's the way forward that Gentoo the distro is going to
>> take with regards to how the boot process works on the system, then I
>> have something to say about it, as it affects me, a Gentoo developer.
>
> Please note that I would be the first one, from a QA point of view, to
> raise a huge question mark if somebody is planning to make this the
> default anytime soon.
>
> You want to keep it around as an option? Sure, feel free.
>
> Moving as default? Over my dead public key.
>