| 1 |
On 15-09-2014 15:58:00 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> > If the argument is that there are no Changelogs in rsync, then let's write |
| 3 |
> > git hooks to generate them when the repository is mirrored to the rsync |
| 4 |
> > host. The only problem I see is with this is then adding ChangeLog to the |
| 5 |
> > manifest and gpg signing it which has to be done at the developer's side. |
| 6 |
> > But, I think the tree that users get from rsync should have the logs. |
| 7 |
> > Having *both* a ChangeLog file and git log is redundant. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'll add this to the next Council agenda. I think this is ripe for |
| 11 |
> discussion. The last discussion of this really wasn't aimed at git |
| 12 |
> anyway. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Not sure if you've read the discussions that were done on this topic. |
| 15 |
The Council decided (due to git and auto-generation of ChangeLogs) that |
| 16 |
ChangeLogs need to be amended, updated or changed. That to fix |
| 17 |
misleading typos, and more. ChangeLogs are meant for our users. For |
| 18 |
this reason repoman was changed to update the ChangeLog automatically on |
| 19 |
commit, if no changes to this file had been made. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 24 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives