Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brandon Edens <brandon@××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:51:13
Message-Id: 20070411234821.GA31308@bruno.petnet.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal by Marius Mauch
1 On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:59:35AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:32:49 +0200
4 > Alexandre Buisse <nattfodd@g.o> wrote:
5 >
6 > [snip]
7 > > Please criticize this with everything constructive you > can think of.
8 >
9 > This idea of putting almost everything into its own repo/overlay will IMO end up in the same mess that several other distros have with tons of 3rd party repos that don't play nice with each other. In case you don't know, the "one stop" philosophy with one central repo is what attracts a lot of people to Gentoo.
10
11 I think a lot of the problems with those other distributions and their 3rd party
12 repositories is related to the fact that they are binary-based distributions and
13 we are not.
14
15 Having an ebuild that
16 DEPENDS on such and such >= than a certain version and having ebuilds named after
17 the projects they represent. well...
18
19 Brandon
20
21 --
22 Brandon Edens brandon@××××××.edu
23 http://www.brandonedens.org
24 key 0x55438F48

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>