| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Can we qualify each of these into one of your categories? (NB: I |
| 7 |
> realize there are solutions for each of these examples. I'm pointing |
| 8 |
> out that not only is the situation not black and white, it often ranges |
| 9 |
> in the ultra-violet.) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
++ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Anyone, however, who is of the opinion that tests for their packages are |
| 16 |
> so important that they should never be skipped, and who is willing to |
| 17 |
> deal with the bug reports that will undeniably be generated as a result, |
| 18 |
> should IMO be allowed to shoot themselves in the foot, while those |
| 19 |
> uninterested can go about their business without further interruption. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> In no way should this be tied to EAPI. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
This should be appended with "A wise man once said ..." |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Unless there is some overwhelming evidence that a majority of users have |
| 28 |
FEATURES="test" and USE="test" set I can only see the costs of this far |
| 29 |
outweighing the benefits. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
- -- |
| 33 |
Alistair John Bush |
| 34 |
Developer Gentoo Java |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
OpenPGP key 0x4900CFB7 |
| 37 |
www.gentoo.org |
| 38 |
www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java |
| 39 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 40 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 41 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
iD8DBQFGPVk0RJGZcUkAz7cRAvLxAKCMmVsmTYxboAnUg7BoElZab2K6uwCcDvLo |
| 44 |
IXdW+e12W/yMlq7WkDXhE2E= |
| 45 |
=o83O |
| 46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives