Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgcrypt/files/, dev-libs/libgcrypt/
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 06:45:13
Message-Id: 20151201074446.131314e5.mgorny@gentoo.org
1 On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC)
2 "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3
5 > Author: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
6 > AuthorDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000
7 > Commit: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
8 > CommitDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000
9 > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1519f072
10 >
11 > dev-libs/libgcrypt: cleanup
12 >
13 > Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1
14 >
15 > dev-libs/libgcrypt/Manifest | 1 -
16 > .../libgcrypt/files/libgcrypt-1.5.0-uscore.patch | 33 ---------
17 > .../files/libgcrypt-1.5.4-clang-arm.patch | 84 ----------------------
18 > dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1.ebuild | 57 ---------------
19 > dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r100.ebuild | 58 ---------------
20
21 Isn't the point of compatibility slots like :11 there that they should
22 be kept for binary packages to work? Because you just removed that,
23 plus all 1.5* versions, effectively causing huge breakage:
24
25 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1193
26 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1219
27 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1082
28 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1108
29 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1134
30 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1997
31 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l208
32 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l234
33 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l249
34 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l460
35 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l898
36 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l2088
37
38 Please fix this ASAP and next time check reverse dependencies before
39 removing packages.
40
41 --
42 Best regards,
43 Michał Górny
44 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies