Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgcrypt/files/, dev-libs/libgcrypt/
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 06:46:15
Message-Id: CAOazyz235vrWgdkixzOd-ZSV4rD4_3kQKLUHYMT8MrBYQhgfaA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgcrypt/files/, dev-libs/libgcrypt/ by "Michał Górny"
1 Yes, sorry my bad, repoman did not complain.
2
3 On 1 December 2015 at 08:44, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
4 > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC)
5 > "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 >> commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3
8 >> Author: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
9 >> AuthorDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000
10 >> Commit: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
11 >> CommitDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000
12 >> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1519f072
13 >>
14 >> dev-libs/libgcrypt: cleanup
15 >>
16 >> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1
17 >>
18 >> dev-libs/libgcrypt/Manifest | 1 -
19 >> .../libgcrypt/files/libgcrypt-1.5.0-uscore.patch | 33 ---------
20 >> .../files/libgcrypt-1.5.4-clang-arm.patch | 84 ----------------------
21 >> dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1.ebuild | 57 ---------------
22 >> dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r100.ebuild | 58 ---------------
23 >
24 > Isn't the point of compatibility slots like :11 there that they should
25 > be kept for binary packages to work? Because you just removed that,
26 > plus all 1.5* versions, effectively causing huge breakage:
27 >
28 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1193
29 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1219
30 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1082
31 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1108
32 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1134
33 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1997
34 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l208
35 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l234
36 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l249
37 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l460
38 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l898
39 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l2088
40 >
41 > Please fix this ASAP and next time check reverse dependencies before
42 > removing packages.
43 >
44 > --
45 > Best regards,
46 > Michał Górny
47 > <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies