Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgcrypt/files/, dev-libs/libgcrypt/
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:45:15
Message-Id: 565F4A41.7080404@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgcrypt/files/, dev-libs/libgcrypt/ by Alon Bar-Lev
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 12/1/2015 1:45 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
5 > Yes, sorry my bad, repoman did not complain.
6
7 This is still not working because some packages, i.e sys-fs/ntfs3g,
8 have a dependency like <dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.6.0:0
9
10
11 Brian
12 >
13 > On 1 December 2015 at 08:44, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
14 > wrote:
15 >> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC) "Alon Bar-Lev"
16 >> <alonbl@g.o> wrote:
17 >>
18 >>> commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3 Author:
19 >>> Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Tue Dec
20 >>> 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 Commit: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT>
21 >>> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000
22 >>> URL:
23 >>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1519f072
24 >>>
25 >>> dev-libs/libgcrypt: cleanup
26 >>>
27 >>> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1
28 >>>
29 >>> dev-libs/libgcrypt/Manifest | 1 -
30 >>> .../libgcrypt/files/libgcrypt-1.5.0-uscore.patch | 33
31 >>> --------- .../files/libgcrypt-1.5.4-clang-arm.patch |
32 >>> 84 ----------------------
33 >>> dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1.ebuild | 57
34 >>> --------------- dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r100.ebuild
35 >>> | 58 ---------------
36 >>
37 >> Isn't the point of compatibility slots like :11 there that they
38 >> should be kept for binary packages to work? Because you just
39 >> removed that, plus all 1.5* versions, effectively causing huge
40 >> breakage:
41 >>
42 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1193
43 >>
44 >>
45 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1219
46 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1082
47 >>
48 >>
49 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1108
50 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1134
51 >>
52 >>
53 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1997
54 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l208
55 >>
56 >>
57 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l234
58 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l249
59 >>
60 >>
61 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l460
62 >> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l898
63 >>
64 >>
65 https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l2088
66 >>
67 >> Please fix this ASAP and next time check reverse dependencies
68 >> before removing packages.
69 >>
70 >> -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
71 >
72
73 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
74 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
75
76 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWX0pBAAoJENH3ge/59KO2paIP/2HD9sGS51V3SblZlC28YHLv
77 96eBOqlmaWbYlOPsHjYvnTot4B3bQauLeobAEWsmOQ5nTaPW1qPD2jjli6+p48lB
78 KBlU1n6RP6JSoaTet5fiAxe65Ih4/rEb24de0MniF4pAtU6U+QP01wW59pHrgWlj
79 pe6PafUtAiW7RdnoZ5t/QKmrnJYd1qYk7KsJMo+xZYqejKi6QJaURnrExI9A4X3e
80 kxcDHOv1ugyQUW3SKOeyUXNi8Hxuhvod5ENYrPdIxWBvS4ncXgmh61vCfQCbTLY4
81 VbkMCh5mnnrbfWLRb2btucqP2N+PhAUkGh0rtD5ELNrmznWMDZoUuFD2SNEPZN8Q
82 UOpEWbIIF2YfxMIukfPfibEJ4fWch8GnnOfhUwulitjLLZ1Cx+tFOlvWKFNxf0Fp
83 Qo2LfWULiu220ocF6TAig3uCdWV0sL5qfCHGyno28aMfhXET81umzc1IHhWTeZcs
84 jkCE6cq9HYybZ0wAGGp7IWoyqOnsrE3/0QubiLXICb48AhxuqRIeSmllfrmn+B4O
85 K9l4+KQaX3pSuudakm23HaNVhpRaAq/OjX1phTXJO8EvAjgyWv0TKVMihrSp5dDj
86 smINjuwHkV3PnK5L3c+enNT9P65sZrNAU1IqoDtVpGzJgEyZyZ/gD7QYBUFcj69/
87 bqHlLvtROzoUv4/S8R0E
88 =zvh3
89 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies