1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 12/1/2015 1:45 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
5 |
> Yes, sorry my bad, repoman did not complain. |
6 |
|
7 |
This is still not working because some packages, i.e sys-fs/ntfs3g, |
8 |
have a dependency like <dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.6.0:0 |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
Brian |
12 |
> |
13 |
> On 1 December 2015 at 08:44, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
14 |
> wrote: |
15 |
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC) "Alon Bar-Lev" |
16 |
>> <alonbl@g.o> wrote: |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>>> commit: 1519f072b810c69428badbe5fc54960f1a2a12b3 Author: |
19 |
>>> Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> AuthorDate: Tue Dec |
20 |
>>> 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 Commit: Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl <AT> |
21 |
>>> gentoo <DOT> org> CommitDate: Tue Dec 1 06:16:26 2015 +0000 |
22 |
>>> URL: |
23 |
>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1519f072 |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> dev-libs/libgcrypt: cleanup |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> dev-libs/libgcrypt/Manifest | 1 - |
30 |
>>> .../libgcrypt/files/libgcrypt-1.5.0-uscore.patch | 33 |
31 |
>>> --------- .../files/libgcrypt-1.5.4-clang-arm.patch | |
32 |
>>> 84 ---------------------- |
33 |
>>> dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r1.ebuild | 57 |
34 |
>>> --------------- dev-libs/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.5.4-r100.ebuild |
35 |
>>> | 58 --------------- |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> Isn't the point of compatibility slots like :11 there that they |
38 |
>> should be kept for binary packages to work? Because you just |
39 |
>> removed that, plus all 1.5* versions, effectively causing huge |
40 |
>> breakage: |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1193 |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> |
45 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/2.html#l1219 |
46 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1082 |
47 |
>> |
48 |
>> |
49 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1108 |
50 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1134 |
51 |
>> |
52 |
>> |
53 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/3.html#l1997 |
54 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l208 |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> |
57 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l234 |
58 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l249 |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> |
61 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/11.html#l460 |
62 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l898 |
63 |
>> |
64 |
>> |
65 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c08cdfb/12.html#l2088 |
66 |
>> |
67 |
>> Please fix this ASAP and next time check reverse dependencies |
68 |
>> before removing packages. |
69 |
>> |
70 |
>> -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
71 |
> |
72 |
|
73 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
74 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) |
75 |
|
76 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWX0pBAAoJENH3ge/59KO2paIP/2HD9sGS51V3SblZlC28YHLv |
77 |
96eBOqlmaWbYlOPsHjYvnTot4B3bQauLeobAEWsmOQ5nTaPW1qPD2jjli6+p48lB |
78 |
KBlU1n6RP6JSoaTet5fiAxe65Ih4/rEb24de0MniF4pAtU6U+QP01wW59pHrgWlj |
79 |
pe6PafUtAiW7RdnoZ5t/QKmrnJYd1qYk7KsJMo+xZYqejKi6QJaURnrExI9A4X3e |
80 |
kxcDHOv1ugyQUW3SKOeyUXNi8Hxuhvod5ENYrPdIxWBvS4ncXgmh61vCfQCbTLY4 |
81 |
VbkMCh5mnnrbfWLRb2btucqP2N+PhAUkGh0rtD5ELNrmznWMDZoUuFD2SNEPZN8Q |
82 |
UOpEWbIIF2YfxMIukfPfibEJ4fWch8GnnOfhUwulitjLLZ1Cx+tFOlvWKFNxf0Fp |
83 |
Qo2LfWULiu220ocF6TAig3uCdWV0sL5qfCHGyno28aMfhXET81umzc1IHhWTeZcs |
84 |
jkCE6cq9HYybZ0wAGGp7IWoyqOnsrE3/0QubiLXICb48AhxuqRIeSmllfrmn+B4O |
85 |
K9l4+KQaX3pSuudakm23HaNVhpRaAq/OjX1phTXJO8EvAjgyWv0TKVMihrSp5dDj |
86 |
smINjuwHkV3PnK5L3c+enNT9P65sZrNAU1IqoDtVpGzJgEyZyZ/gD7QYBUFcj69/ |
87 |
bqHlLvtROzoUv4/S8R0E |
88 |
=zvh3 |
89 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |