| 1 |
On Friday 23 January 2004 22:08, Drake Wyrm wrote: |
| 2 |
> Just as a fork on this thread... Is there a difference in content between |
| 3 |
> the CVS tree and the rsyncable portage tree? Any thoughts about allowing |
| 4 |
> anonymous pserver access to the CVS tree? I think I read somewhere |
| 5 |
> (or maybe I'm just hallucinating) that pserver access was once enabled, |
| 6 |
> but the decision was made to remove it. If this is correct, what were |
| 7 |
> the reasons for that decision? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
There is no actual reason except that the rsync tree has a delay of I believe |
| 10 |
about 1 hour. The reason for disabling pserver is that it cost way too much |
| 11 |
resources on the single cvs server we ha{d,ve}. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Paul |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 18 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 19 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives