Archives
Archives
| From: | Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] CVS and non-devs (still!) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:02:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040123210819.GA12189@phaenix.haell.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] CVS and non-devs (again!) by John Nilsson |
||
| 1 | Just as a fork on this thread... Is there a difference in content between |
| 2 | the CVS tree and the rsyncable portage tree? Any thoughts about allowing |
| 3 | anonymous pserver access to the CVS tree? I think I read somewhere |
| 4 | (or maybe I'm just hallucinating) that pserver access was once enabled, |
| 5 | but the decision was made to remove it. If this is correct, what were |
| 6 | the reasons for that decision? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? |
| 10 | Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. |
| 11 | --Ghost in the Shell |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS and non-devs (still!) | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS and non-devs (still!) | Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS and non-devs (still!) | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |