1 |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Maier <tamiko@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> And I see absolutely no harm in explicitly annotating the actual |
3 |
> copyright in gentoo ebuilds. |
4 |
|
5 |
It seems like a simple and practical enough way to go. However, one of |
6 |
the arguments going for assigning copyright to the Gentoo foundation |
7 |
at the time we discussed it is that it offers some level of legal |
8 |
protection to the developer or external contributor. I have first hand |
9 |
experience of how abusive lawyers can sue you for totally invalid |
10 |
IP-related reasons and ruin your life. I've been fighting exactly that |
11 |
for almost 10 years now. So I certainly appreciate the comfort that |
12 |
assigning copyright of my Gentoo work to the foundation provides me. |
13 |
Having grown up in Europe I can see why people would think this could |
14 |
never happen to them, but living in the US has taught me differently. |
15 |
|
16 |
That said, we could always make it possible for the developer to |
17 |
voluntarily assign copyright to the foundation if (s)he so desires. |
18 |
And I would certainly do that for myself. |
19 |
|
20 |
Calchan. |