1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
So where are we at with alpha currently? |
4 |
|
5 |
Xorg-1.5 |
6 |
-------- |
7 |
As some of you know, xorg-1.5 abandoned the "classic" way of |
8 |
interfacing with PCI and AGP cards in favor of using |
9 |
libpciaccess. That, in turn expects support from the kernel in |
10 |
the form of /sys/devices/<bus>/<id>/<func>/resourceN files. |
11 |
|
12 |
Unfortunately, alpha until recently hat no support for those PCI |
13 |
resources (which is partly due to the way alpha IO space is |
14 |
structured and partly due to a crucial extension not being |
15 |
available on old Alphas (older than EV5). |
16 |
|
17 |
As such, we weren't able to keyword or stabilize Xorg-1.5 until |
18 |
recently, when 2.6.30-rc* saw support finally being added. |
19 |
Naturally, packages depending on >=xorg-1.5 had to be held off, |
20 |
too. |
21 |
|
22 |
The -rc kernels are keyworded ~alpha so people can test. So far, |
23 |
-rc3 and rc4 are looking good, so we will keyword xorg and deps |
24 |
soon (I'm aiming for this weekend) and if all goes well, we will |
25 |
have it stable, soon. |
26 |
|
27 |
Note that this will mean that people with EV4-Alphas will *not* |
28 |
be able to use Xorg-1.5 just now. I feel that those machines are |
29 |
so slow that very few will run X11 anyway, if there are Gentoo |
30 |
installations on those to start with. |
31 |
|
32 |
Glibc/Toolchain |
33 |
--------------- |
34 |
|
35 |
Glibc has had a bug for ages (regarding ceil() and friends, bug |
36 |
number 264335) which should really be fixed. Upstream is umm.. |
37 |
their usual selves about it. On top, a patch for fdatasync() (bug |
38 |
264336) is available which upstream... well, you get it. |
39 |
|
40 |
Workload |
41 |
-------- |
42 |
|
43 |
Currently, the alpha arch team consists of me (the nominal lead) |
44 |
and armin76 who helps a lot with getting stable request answered |
45 |
in a timely manner. |
46 |
|
47 |
Also, we're in the process of recruiting mattst88 as an arch |
48 |
tester. He's currently deep in exam-land at university, so the |
49 |
process is on hold for now. |
50 |
|
51 |
Users/Community |
52 |
--------------- |
53 |
|
54 |
Aside from those on the team and one or two other devs, I've had |
55 |
little to no direct feedback from Gentoo alpha users. I try to |
56 |
write about Alpha regularly on my blog (available on the planet) |
57 |
and I'm easily reachable as Blackb|rd on Freenode (#gentoo-alpha, |
58 |
naturally). |
59 |
|
60 |
I've been toying with the idea of offering something akin to |
61 |
Debians popularity contest tool. Some people are rather |
62 |
uncomfortable with data gathering tools that send stuff to some |
63 |
strangers, so I don't know how well it would work. I list this |
64 |
idea here, since I have just about no idea what actual alpha |
65 |
hardware is used with Gentoo out there. Knowing which packages |
66 |
are actually *used* (instead of just being stabilized for the |
67 |
heck of it) would be nice. Added benefit of that would be that |
68 |
users helping with testing would reduce workload. |
69 |
|
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
In essence: we're busy and I'd love to get more feedback what |
73 |
people (both users and devs) think we could do better, or |
74 |
more/less of. |
75 |
|
76 |
Regards, |
77 |
Tobias, |
78 |
who turned 42 in octal today |
79 |
|
80 |
|
81 |
-- |
82 |
The only problem with troubleshooting is that sometimes, |
83 |
trouble shoots back. |