Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 23:30:36
Message-Id: 20060523002457.78034303@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2 by Jon Portnoy
1 On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:10:22 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote:
2 | Well, let's take the real life example of paludis vs. portage:
3 | Paludis is controlled by a former developer known for being hard to
4 | work with, Portage (being a Gentoo project) by necessitity has to be
5 | controlled by someone other developers can work with (else the
6 | council can intervene and fix the problem with new management).
7
8 So why has the council not intervened to demand that all those features
9 that Gentoo developers require be introduced?
10
11 --
12 Ciaran McCreesh
13 Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk
14
15
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>