Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luis Francisco Araujo <araujo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:04:21
Message-Id: 4848E554.6040903@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself) by David Leverton
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 David Leverton wrote:
5 | On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote:
6 |> Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi?
7 |>
8 |> I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my
9 |> system and with disabled libffi USE-flag.
10 |
11 | According to my reading of the code, it doesn't use libffi on x86-linux,
12 | ppc-linux and ppc-darwin, but does on all other platforms. In any
13 case, it
14 | should be fine with the libffi in gcc, it's just a case of the maintainer
15 | finding time to update the ebuild.
16
17 It used to strictly depend on libffi for some earlier versions of
18 squeak, so the DEPEND was there long before I added myself as the
19 maintainer of the package.
20
21 It isn't needed right now _unless_ you have squeak packages requiring so
22 (and we don't have those in the tree), so it is safe to remove such a
23 dependency and probably add a libffi USE flag conditional for those
24 willing to use the GCC one.
25
26 Regards,
27
28 - --
29
30 Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org"
31 Gentoo Linux
32
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
35
36 iEYEARECAAYFAkhI5VQACgkQNir3WYj9aLro2QCbBm14/mBTjL0UEuSSBZwP1BSm
37 KJEAn0EA4mzQZutzefHfsGEWIDg6LbKF
38 =q2lC
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
40 --
41 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list