| 1 |
2009/5/17 Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 17 May 2009, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hello, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously) |
| 10 |
>> 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change |
| 11 |
>> 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension |
| 12 |
>> change |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Judging from this list, fourth option present in the GLEP is |
| 15 |
> unacceptable for you? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I would like to avoid user-visible breakage as much as possible. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best Regards, |
| 21 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
Archives