1 |
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 10:27, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
2 |
<snip> |
3 |
> As I posted in other mails - there are a few good reasons why we do |
4 |
> things as we do, and the CONFIG_EXCLUDE might be a solution to the |
5 |
> 'problem' (which in my opinion is still not CONFIG_PROTECT or 100% |
6 |
> the comments in the config files, but rather the 'merge process needed |
7 |
> for config files). |
8 |
|
9 |
What about a modification to etc-update that allows portions of a file |
10 |
to be protected? Something along the lines of: |
11 |
|
12 |
#Instructional comments |
13 |
#PROTECTED |
14 |
|
15 |
CFLAGS="..." |
16 |
|
17 |
#/PROTECTED |
18 |
|
19 |
Such tags and a method to auto-merge comment updates should eliminate a |
20 |
lot of the superfluous config file merging. |
21 |
|
22 |
Just a thought, |
23 |
|
24 |
Doug |