| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 07:03:27 +0200 Christian Hartmann <ian@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| > Please try to come up with something sliiightly more plausible than |
| 4 |
| > that when you're trying to attack something based upon your personal |
| 5 |
| > prejudices. Or is that really the best criticism you can find? |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| Uh yeah. It's all just based on my personal prejudices. - Why did I |
| 8 |
| give paludis a try (on several VMs) then first? Remember when paludis |
| 9 |
| was segfaulting? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Sure. You ran -svn (our release check procedures would have caught |
| 12 |
that before it hit a release anyway), found a bug, and it got fixed and |
| 13 |
a testcase was added to ensure that the same kind of issue didn't |
| 14 |
reoccur. Did you want a cookie or something? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
| That's how you want to understand it. It's easy to pervert the facts |
| 17 |
| if one just constantly writes the same FUD over and over again. But |
| 18 |
| this doesn't change anything. People will become tired to discuss the |
| 19 |
| profile changes. Then the profile will be added. - You win. - Hooray. |
| 20 |
| |
| 21 |
| It has always been that way. - Changes won't be made because they are |
| 22 |
| sensible. They will be made because people are sick off wasting their |
| 23 |
| time on discussions like that. - So am I. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If you'd like far less time wasted on discussions, perhaps you and your |
| 26 |
co-offenders should try not posting huge numbers of emails that are |
| 27 |
free of technical objections. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 31 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives