Archives
Archives
| From: | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | boot loader in @system, was Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider | ||
| Date: | Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:28:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 56BA21C0.7010900@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | William Hubbs schrieb: |
| 2 | > A boot loader is also needed for a working system, but we do not > have one in @system. Instead, we direct the user to choose one. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Actually it is not strictly necessary to install a separate boot |
| 5 | loader. On EFI systems (arm and x86, not ia64 though), the kernel's |
| 6 | EFI stub will function as boot loader. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Best regards, |
| 10 | Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |