| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Well, if we're going to force it to be in the stage3, I guess this |
| 5 |
> > boils down to whether eudev or udev is the better nano. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> "Nicht alles was hinkt ist ein Vergleich", as we say in German. |
| 8 |
> Emacs has a flexible extension language, whereas nano uses a |
| 9 |
> configuration file. Not sure in which direction this would map to |
| 10 |
> OpenRC and systemd. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > I think it makes far more sense to just remove some of the controversy |
| 13 |
> > by taking it out of the system set first. Then I doubt anybody would |
| 14 |
> > notice the switch. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Take what out of the system set? virtual/udev isn't there, in the |
| 17 |
> first place, and virtual/dev-manager is needed for a working system. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
A boot loader is also needed for a working system, but we do not have |
| 20 |
one in @system. Instead, we direct the user to choose one. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
William |
Archives