| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Duncan wrote: |
| 4 |
> Now, for worst-case comparison, on the same machine, what's the |
| 5 |
> respective times for a full systemd build? (I'm not saying actually |
| 6 |
> merge it, just configure/compile, plus see the next paragraph.) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think my first set of numbers illustrates that: just running |
| 9 |
"make" should be a full build, AIUI. For that scenario (and the |
| 10 |
machine in question, the factor was somewhere between 9 and 10 |
| 11 |
times slower for a full build. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> So far, the results are encouraging. Higher times, but not THAT much |
| 14 |
> higher, with the new version. But if the worst happens and we really DO |
| 15 |
> end up building all of systemd and then throwing most of it away, what's |
| 16 |
> the relative times for THAT? That's actually what I was asking earlier, |
| 17 |
> and this gets us part way to the answers, but not all the way. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Regardless, thanks, this is considerably more solid information than was |
| 20 |
> available earlier, and not everyone has a geode to actually do the test |
| 21 |
> on, so these numbers are a real contribution to the available |
| 22 |
> information, indeed! =:^) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I'll try the whole thing again sometime later this week (in my |
| 25 |
copious free time!). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Tobias |
Archives