Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation | ||
| Date: | Sun, 26 Apr 2020 09:10:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | upnbulijc@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The other major problem is spam protection. The best semi-anonymous way |
| 4 | > I see is to use submitter's IPv4 addresses (can we support IPv6 then?). |
| 5 | > We could set a limit of, say, 10 submissions per IPv4 address per week. |
| 6 | > If some address would exceed that limit, we could require CAPTCHA |
| 7 | > authorization. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Instead of using the IP address, you could generate a UUID when |
| 10 | installing the tool. This would also take care of clusters with machines |
| 11 | that are clones of each other. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation | "Toralf Förster" <toralf@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation | "Andreas K. Hüttel" <dilfridge@g.o> |