Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 539C7554.4060703@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Ciaran McCreesh: |
| 2 | > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000 |
| 3 | > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | >> Ciaran McCreesh: |
| 5 | >>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 |
| 6 | >>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 | >>>> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than |
| 8 | >>>> necessary. |
| 9 | >>> |
| 10 | >>> This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. |
| 11 | >> |
| 12 | >> Why not? |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you're using the |
| 15 | > wrong distribution. |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | |
| 18 | I cannot see an argument against avoiding useless rebuilds here. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |