Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:45:51 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000 |
| 2 | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Ciaran McCreesh: |
| 4 | > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 |
| 5 | > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 | > >> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than |
| 7 | > >> necessary. |
| 8 | > > |
| 9 | > > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > Why not? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you're using the |
| 14 | wrong distribution. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |