1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: |
5 |
> Hey list, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of |
8 |
> weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be |
9 |
> resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more |
10 |
> outdated, open unfixed security bugs are present[1][2] and at some |
11 |
> point in the future =x11-libs/gtk+-2* will vanish from the tree I |
12 |
> don't see any other option than removing xchat from the tree. I |
13 |
> don't see this as a big drama as we already have a drop-in |
14 |
> replacement in form of the net-irc/hexchat fork. I checked this |
15 |
> today and all people have to do is emerge hexchat and then copy |
16 |
> over the xchat config: mkdir ${HOME}/.config ; cp -a |
17 |
> ${HOME}/.xchat2 ${HOME}/.config/hexchat |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I'd like to see your opinion on this matter as long as you have one |
20 |
> you'd like to share with me ;) Furthermore I would shift my |
21 |
> attention from the xchat package to hexchat seeing that it |
22 |
> currently gets proxy maintained. If there's no objection I'd like |
23 |
> to become the new contact of the person currently maintaining the |
24 |
> package in portage. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as |
27 |
> soon as I lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to |
28 |
> hexchat. As I never did this before I'd like to have some help |
29 |
> concerning this matter. Is there some documentation about portage |
30 |
> news? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Regards |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/394657 [2] |
36 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/257006 |
37 |
|
38 |
That's a pity. I was just about to step forward to rescue |
39 |
net-irc/xchat-xsys from treecleaning. |
40 |
|
41 |
Do xchat plugins work in hexchat? |
42 |
|
43 |
Maybe we could just hardmask it. I see some ebuilds in the tree being |
44 |
hardmasked due to security bugs, but not removed which is ok to me. |
45 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
46 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
47 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
48 |
|
49 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQsoeGAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzkk0H/3GWd1Onq+xZXIaSs7InDooW |
50 |
1GHhpVg4kJm/rYAH3qeO3USEhHaE9ul+EzdE+F6T9koEbWWrTZ9mLeDjrmmuig3i |
51 |
aJc9wymm3JUCUXVe+m5aCWN/rpxvuaey4LBQnjUfdb1njUmIljnhx8PzEibyCrAc |
52 |
k8sLGV0c6/e+PibDr6Exca7p/9yCgiCAfifcTI9XsSZGy8E6tBgV2wfaNN3K/XsA |
53 |
vB9zBVQ6d3BXleExTQ03VL+MOlYf4Y7Zn5jafu5bouEcplXqrbWnbdtDPvcb/xjT |
54 |
LdwelXOxwVp/U6ELftBUtxF47c68vnHvmVDa6N9Zz4PRbvpqiq9pqYXaGZHN3+o= |
55 |
=LfSU |
56 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |