Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:03:56
Message-Id: 50B28787.5090100@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat by Lars Wendler
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
5 > Hey list,
6 >
7 > I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of
8 > weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be
9 > resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more
10 > outdated, open unfixed security bugs are present[1][2] and at some
11 > point in the future =x11-libs/gtk+-2* will vanish from the tree I
12 > don't see any other option than removing xchat from the tree. I
13 > don't see this as a big drama as we already have a drop-in
14 > replacement in form of the net-irc/hexchat fork. I checked this
15 > today and all people have to do is emerge hexchat and then copy
16 > over the xchat config: mkdir ${HOME}/.config ; cp -a
17 > ${HOME}/.xchat2 ${HOME}/.config/hexchat
18 >
19 > I'd like to see your opinion on this matter as long as you have one
20 > you'd like to share with me ;) Furthermore I would shift my
21 > attention from the xchat package to hexchat seeing that it
22 > currently gets proxy maintained. If there's no objection I'd like
23 > to become the new contact of the person currently maintaining the
24 > package in portage.
25 >
26 > I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as
27 > soon as I lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to
28 > hexchat. As I never did this before I'd like to have some help
29 > concerning this matter. Is there some documentation about portage
30 > news?
31 >
32 > Regards
33 >
34 >
35 > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/394657 [2]
36 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/257006
37
38 That's a pity. I was just about to step forward to rescue
39 net-irc/xchat-xsys from treecleaning.
40
41 Do xchat plugins work in hexchat?
42
43 Maybe we could just hardmask it. I see some ebuilds in the tree being
44 hardmasked due to security bugs, but not removed which is ok to me.
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
47 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
48
49 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQsoeGAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzkk0H/3GWd1Onq+xZXIaSs7InDooW
50 1GHhpVg4kJm/rYAH3qeO3USEhHaE9ul+EzdE+F6T9koEbWWrTZ9mLeDjrmmuig3i
51 aJc9wymm3JUCUXVe+m5aCWN/rpxvuaey4LBQnjUfdb1njUmIljnhx8PzEibyCrAc
52 k8sLGV0c6/e+PibDr6Exca7p/9yCgiCAfifcTI9XsSZGy8E6tBgV2wfaNN3K/XsA
53 vB9zBVQ6d3BXleExTQ03VL+MOlYf4Y7Zn5jafu5bouEcplXqrbWnbdtDPvcb/xjT
54 LdwelXOxwVp/U6ELftBUtxF47c68vnHvmVDa6N9Zz4PRbvpqiq9pqYXaGZHN3+o=
55 =LfSU
56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o>