| 1 |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:36:51 +0100 |
| 2 |
Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Why can't it be in the file but readable without sourcing? For |
| 4 |
> instance, it could be mandatory that EAPI=X, if present, must be the |
| 5 |
> first non-blank and non-comment line of the ebuild (and it would then |
| 6 |
> be checked after sourcing, if the ebuild is sourced, to bug on cases |
| 7 |
> where it's redefined or unset afterwards). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That's another option. It's considered less ideal because it's a nasty |
| 10 |
hack -- it imposes restrictions beyond "it's bash" upon the format of |
| 11 |
ebuilds. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives