1 |
sön 2001-10-14 klockan 23.34 skrev Karl Trygve Kalleberg: |
2 |
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:37:23 -0400 |
3 |
> Blue Lizard <webmaster@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > bugzilla _could_ handle this, but while it is technically ready enough |
6 |
> > our development team is in no way prepared to handle the influx of new |
7 |
> > users that would find it a pain in the neck to use. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Then we find something that's easier to use. We really want this to |
10 |
> further Gentoo development, not hamper it. I do not think our current |
11 |
> system with sporadic mails to the gentoo-dev (and sometimes |
12 |
> gentoo-ebuild!) list is good enough. |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't think that anyone thinks that gnome-dev a good solution for |
15 |
bugreporting. (After all it should be a developer-list for |
16 |
devel-discussions). |
17 |
|
18 |
I think that we should start using a bug-tracking system and that we |
19 |
should start doing so soon. As I've said before, Bugzilla is really |
20 |
powerful but can also be a large step for new users. However, this is |
21 |
with the default-interface, we could do our own interface that's easier |
22 |
to use. |
23 |
|
24 |
Someone also mentioned roundup (http://roundup.sourceforge.net/). I |
25 |
tried to get it running on my Gentoo-machine but it didn't want to play. |
26 |
Someone (and me) should give it another try. |
27 |
|
28 |
IMHO, we can choose either as long as it works. I also think that we |
29 |
should use this system for our "todo"'s, in other words, start using the |
30 |
bug-tracking system for what we currently uses Dev-wiki. |
31 |
|
32 |
I'm not sure about Roundup but bugzilla can also be used for handling |
33 |
ebuilds (instead of gentoo-ebuild-list). |
34 |
|
35 |
Regards, |
36 |
Mikael Hallendal |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
|
40 |
Mikael Hallendal |
41 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader |
42 |
CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden |