Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:04:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090122170233.1dab8ef7@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:56:23 -0800 |
| 2 | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Can this be fixed by adding bash dependencies to things using new |
| 4 | > features? As long as we keep them out of the build path of bash, |
| 5 | > things ought to work. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Only if you're guaranteed bash 3.1 on boxes that do metadata |
| 8 | generation. Which means it won't work for overlays. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > Then we could add a repoman check for new features, if we wanted. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Can't do that unless you write a feature-complete bash parser and |
| 13 | pretend-execute every possible path an ebuild can take... |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> |