1 |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 5:49 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 16:01 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:42 PM Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > That git manages not to die every day based on what we throw at it is |
7 |
> > > frankly a miracle of engineering. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Our repo is a linked list being constantly manipulated from the head |
10 |
> > backed by a hashed object store for the contents. For that use case |
11 |
> > it is probably the ideal data structure. Since our use case is |
12 |
> > actually the typical use case, it isn't a surprise that this was the |
13 |
> > design that was chosen... :) |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Computers are pretty fast when you actually use the correct algorithm... |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Yes, computers are fast and their work is cheap. On the other hand, |
19 |
> humans are not fast and their time is expensive. Now use the power of |
20 |
> human thinking to infer this to what you're doing to this thread. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Not wasting everybody's time with personal attacks? |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Rich |