| 1 |
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:47 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> OK, fine. Devrel does not have an established track record of retiring |
| 3 |
> devs who are otherwise inactive. Please fix this. Please also get an |
| 4 |
> agreement from them that they're going to be willing to take on the |
| 5 |
> additional load of these arch testers. Then please articulate the process |
| 6 |
> that will be followed to ensure they're actively tracked and retired |
| 7 |
> if/when they fall off the map. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I don't know about retiring devs but the AT's should fall under the |
| 10 |
jurisdiction of the Head/lead/strategic lead/whatever the dude in charge |
| 11 |
of the AT's for a platform calls themselves. For amd64 that is hparker, |
| 12 |
dang, blubb, and maybe another one or two developers. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Thanks. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> --kurt |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Tres Melton |
| 19 |
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat |
Archives