Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Vano D <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 'submerge' was Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:24:44
Message-Id: 1067459090.4945.23.camel@gentoo.europeansoftware.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 'submerge' was Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded by "C. Brewer"
1 On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 18:31, C. Brewer wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 8:02, Vano D wrote:
3 >
4 > > The whole thing (with gpm, ncurses, links) is now 22 megs(if you dont
5 > > include gpm, nvurses and links its 3 megs less.. 19 megs for a base
6 > > system). Big for embedded but take in account that I only have made a
7 > > small change in the gentoo scripts. Apart from that change (change
8 > > agetty->getty in inittab) the rest is as it comes with baselayout.
9 >
10 > Just out of curiousity, are these uncompressed binaries? Or have you employed
11 > gzexe to lighten the size?
12
13 No compression. The only thing I did to them after creating the whole
14 thing was rm -Rf /usr/share/{doc,man,info,zoneinfo,terminfo} (if I
15 remember correctly).
16
17 But anyhow.. I am positive it can be made even smaller, by using less
18 binaries, cutting down on the baselayout or using a custom one
19 (slackware rc scripts come to mind) the reason for this is not that the
20 scripts take a lot of space, but they use some binaries and in my case
21 instead of I copy the binaries themselves I emerge the whole package the
22 binaries belong to. And course last but not least, using uglibc should
23 shrink the thing even more (but then incompatibility issues might arise
24 with some packages...)
25
26 Cheers,
27
28 Vano.
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 'submerge' was Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded Christian Gut <cycloon@×××××××.org>