| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Doty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> All- |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise. |
| 6 |
>> Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now. |
| 7 |
>> Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted |
| 8 |
>> overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even |
| 11 |
> discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific |
| 12 |
> channel. Could someone clear me up on this? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Thanks, |
| 15 |
> Donnie |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
because it wasn't a technical decision. it's a temporary compromise |
| 18 |
until whatever governing party can make a decision on to how to handle |
| 19 |
it. I made a compromise that both sides are able to live with until the |
| 20 |
council makes a decision. This is what developer relations should be doing. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm sorry if you view this as a "show of force" or if you feel that I've |
| 23 |
"overstepped by bounds", I did what I felt was correct to diffuse a |
| 24 |
situation and got people back to what they are supposed to be doing, |
| 25 |
developing, not fighting. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
======================================================= |
| 30 |
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org |
| 31 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead |
| 32 |
Gentoo Developer Relations |
| 33 |
Gentoo Recruitment Lead |
| 34 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 35 |
GPG: 0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB 06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7 |
| 36 |
======================================================= |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives