From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] sunrise, a temporary compromise | ||
Date: | Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:54:11 | ||
Message-Id: | 449B72CD.5050903@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] sunrise, a temporary compromise by Mike Doty |
1 | Mike Doty wrote: |
2 | > All- |
3 | > |
4 | > We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise. |
5 | > Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now. |
6 | > Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted |
7 | > overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them. |
8 | |
9 | I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even |
10 | discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific |
11 | channel. Could someone clear me up on this? |
12 | |
13 | Thanks, |
14 | Donnie |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] sunrise, a temporary compromise | Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] sunrise, a temporary compromise | Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> |