| 1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Defining required amount of activity for ebuild devs. I would like us to |
| 3 |
> raise the required amount of activity for ebuild devs. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Given that the low number of developers is ranked as our number one |
| 6 |
problem in Donnie's informal survey[1], taking any kind of action |
| 7 |
against infrequently-committing developers is likely to reduce the |
| 8 |
number of devs we have, and potentially make the problem worse. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
What benefits are you aiming to get from the suggestion? I can think og |
| 11 |
keeping the books tidy and reducing management time required to maintain |
| 12 |
the devs. Are there others I've missed? If they're worth the |
| 13 |
cost/effort involved with putting someone through the dev tests and |
| 14 |
getting them trained, then it seems a good idea, but otherwise probably |
| 15 |
not... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Mike 5:) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
[1] http://dberkholz.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/redux-gentoos-top-3-issues/ |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives