1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, David Michael wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> -# Then you add appropriate dependency to your package. The dependency |
4 |
> -# type(s) should be: |
5 |
> -# - DEPEND (+ RDEPEND) if the group is already needed at build time, |
6 |
> -# - RDEPEND if it is needed at install time (e.g. you 'fowners' files |
7 |
> -# in pkg_preinst) or run time. |
8 |
|
9 |
"man acct-group.eclass" currently renders that paragraph like this: |
10 |
|
11 |
Then you add appropriate dependency to your package. The dependency |
12 |
type(s) should be: - DEPEND (+ RDEPEND) if the group is already needed |
13 |
at build time, - RDEPEND if it is needed at install time (e.g. you |
14 |
'fowners' files |
15 |
in pkg_preinst) or run time. |
16 |
|
17 |
In other words, there's very little formatting support in eclassdoc. |
18 |
|
19 |
> +# Then you add appropriate dependencies to your package. Note that the build |
20 |
> +# system might need to resolve names, too. The dependency type(s) should be: |
21 |
> +# - BDEPEND if the group must be resolvable at build time (e.g. it is used by |
22 |
> +# 'fowners' in src_install), |
23 |
> +# - IDEPEND if it must be resolvable at install time (e.g. it is used by |
24 |
> +# 'fowners' in pkg_preinst), |
25 |
> +# - RDEPEND in every case. |
26 |
|
27 |
So, while at it, could you reformat it that it will be better readable |
28 |
in the generated man page? |
29 |
|
30 |
(Same issue in acct-user.eclass.) |
31 |
|
32 |
Ulrich |