| 1 |
On 28 July 2014 09:46, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Then portage could look for any change in state and that would trigger |
| 4 |
> a build-less re-merge, which would update vdb with the new state |
| 5 |
> (including the new hash). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If we're scared about this being worse than what we have, I notice there's |
| 9 |
a bunch of --rebuild-if-whaetever variables. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For some reason I was under the impression there was already a |
| 12 |
--rebuild-if-deps-changed flag, but I seem to have been wrong about that. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
--rebuild-if-deps-changed=fast # VDB only updates |
| 15 |
--rebuild-if-deps-changed=full # complete reinstall if vdb != tree |
| 16 |
--rebuild-if-deps-changed=n # current behaviour. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Kent |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
*KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives