| 1 |
we can just rename "release" to something like "snapshot" to show that this |
| 2 |
only is Gentoo at a certain time. ie: "gentoo snap-20030801" |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
my 2 cents |
| 5 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 6 |
From: "Owen Gunden" <ogunden@××××××××××××.edu> |
| 7 |
To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 8 |
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 12:20 AM |
| 9 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Spider wrote: |
| 13 |
> > None, there wouldn't be any difference at all in your system. 1.4 is |
| 14 |
> > the package release and the livecd's, not the resulting systems. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This kind of question comes up all the time. I often wonder if it's not a |
| 17 |
> waste of effort to try and force gentoo into a notion of "releases", when |
| 18 |
> it's so unnatural to do so. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It would be cool to come up with some other, more gentoo-ish way of |
| 21 |
> expressing progress in the distribution. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Ideas anyone? Or am I being a total kook? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Owen |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives