| 1 |
Am Dienstag, 6. August 2013, 23:46:08 schrieb Jeroen Roovers: |
| 2 |
> 23:37:25 <willikins> rej, you have notes! [21:13] <mrueg> Let me |
| 3 |
> rephrase this: Just a friendly notice to please refrain from rephrasing |
| 4 |
> bug summaries from "Stabilize ${P}" to "${P} stable req". This just |
| 5 |
> adds unneeded noise to the bug. I don't want this on bugs I've reported |
| 6 |
> or am assigned to. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This is my equally short and "friendly" note: It's not going to happen. |
| 10 |
> Forget about it. They are not "your" bug reports and anyone is |
| 11 |
> actually /welcome/ to improve them. Get used to it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> To get technical on the "improvement" bit, we have agreed time on time |
| 14 |
> that stating the atom and then the action is the way to go. The main |
| 15 |
> reasons is that it helps people who need to regularly read /lists/ of |
| 16 |
> bug summaries sort them better. Until we get a specific [Atoms] field |
| 17 |
> implemented, it will need to stay this way. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Jer, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
please stop making whitespace noise on bugs that you have absolutely no |
| 23 |
relation to. It just causes unnecessary bugmail. If maintainers care they will |
| 24 |
change it themselves. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Cheers, |
| 27 |
Andreas |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) |
| 32 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 33 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives