Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] duplicated USE flag (unicode & utf8)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 18:31:16
Message-Id: 20050503193046.59fc95f5@snowdrop
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] duplicated USE flag (unicode & utf8) by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tue, 3 May 2005 14:21:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | as many know, i dont use unicode, so i'm a bit ignorant of it ...
4 |
5 | is there a good reason for having both a global 'unicode' USE flag and
6 | a bunch of local 'utf8' USE flags ? or should i file bugs for people
7 | to stop using 'utf8' and use 'unicode' instead ?
8
9 utf8 is a particular way of encoding unicode. I'd say that the 'unicode'
10 flag would be sufficient, except if for some reason the following
11 bizarre setup were to occur:
12
13 fooapp has unicode support. fooapp has optional support for the utf-8
14 encoding which pulls in an additional dependency.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
18 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
19 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] duplicated USE flag (unicode & utf8) Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] duplicated USE flag (unicode & utf8) Francesco Riosa <francesco@×××××××××.it>